Anyway, to demonstrate my effectiveness, I turned in a case report just today, and I used the new case reporting form for the first time. A few weeks ago MUFON HQ in Cincinatti was threatening excommunication for anyone who failed to use this new reporting form, and now that I've used it I don't see what the fuss is about. See, to begin with I totally forgot about using the new form and filed my report on the old form... Then I got Vxxxx's email with her reminder to use the new form or else, and I quickly filled in the new form and snuck it in as an attachment to the old form. The thing is, there's not a whole lot of difference between the two.
But in case you ever wondered what an official Certified UFO Field Investigation case report looks like, here you go:
MUFON CASE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
INVESTIGATOR – Mark O’Connell
ID # 18761
CASE NUMBER –
42930
BALLESTER-GUASP
RESULTS - TOTAL CERTAINTY INDEX IS – 0
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE – 44.4683430000/-88.1045645000
SYNOPSIS –
Night sighting: Witness saw two white luminous oblong objects descend from sky
and disappear behind a building
OBJECT
DESCRIPTION – White, luminous, oblong, about twice the size of a car.
EVIDENCE -
None
WEATHER
INFORMATION – Clean, starry sky, no wind
WITNESS
CREDIBILITY – Moderate; he could not be sure he was describing the objects
accurately, but he was eager to know if anyone else had seen the same objects
that night.
WITNESS
INTERVIEW AND STATEMENTS – Witness was driving to work at 11:50 pm on Saturday,
September 29, 2012, in an industrial section of Green Bay. There was no traffic
and the streets had no lighting. He saw a lighted, oblong object in the sky,
about 20 degrees above the ground, descending in a straight line towards some
industrial buildings. Although he was only a few miles from Austin Straubel
airport, he was sure this wasnt a plane; it seemed to move about the same speed
as a landing plane, but there were no wings, no sound and no green and red
lights. He pulled over and got out of the car to watch as the object
disappeared behind a three-story warehouse that was about 300 yards away. He
expected the object to reappear on the other side of the building but it never
did. Then he saw a second, identical object approaching from the same direction
and descending at the same speed and angle. The oblong, glowing object
disappeared behind the same warehouse and did not appear on the other side.
He went back
the next day to inspect the two fields where he thought the objects might have
landed, but he did not find any signs of a landing.
NATURAL
PHENOMENON OR MAN MADE - Unknown
CORRELATING
CASES - Unknown
Pretty neat and orderly, isn't it? Too bad I had to classify the sighting as "Unknown," but the witness, sincere as he was, just didn't give me much to work with. And as a result, I am submitting my first UFO case report with a Ballaster-Guasp Certainty Evaluation of... ZERO. Do you get it? After all this work, filling the form out twice when I could have been playing solitaire, it turns out that there is absolutely zero certainty that this sighting even happened! I'm used to getting 12s and 13s on my cases, and I just got a zero. You have no idea how heartbreaking that is for me...
4 comments:
your greatest drawbacks associated with these heritage grains: they are sometimes tricky to get AS WELL AS It\'s got to be cooked longer. But your current cooking day is decreased whether soaked overnight. Also, a series of will be fried sooner boiling, like fried rice. http://www.mordocrosswords.com/2015/11/editors-workload-abbr.html
Post a Comment