![]() |
Nice shirt, eh? I bought that especially for the interview. My wife says it brings out the blue in my eyes. |
So, there are some mistakes -- the Congressional hearing took place in '66, not '68 -- and there are some lapses, and somehow the oversimplification seemed to make the narrative more complex. My only significant issue is that they made it seem as though Hynek changed his mind about UFOs overnight, which I had worked very hard to argue against with the producer. In retrospect, I should have seen that coming; they wanted a dramatic moment -- an epiphany! -- not a plodding, decade-long process...
But, I can correct that in the book, and in the talk I give next March in Michigan. In that sense, tonight's show was sort of a warm-up to the main event!
1 comment:
Hi Mark,
I didn't see the show but congratulations. On the book about Hynek, do you intend to discuss the relationship he had with Allan Hendry? For instance was there any strain between the two.
I'm curious because of the various reviews on Hendry's "The UFO Handbook". He caught flack from both sides of the fence apparently.
Post a Comment